Monday, April 14, 2014

How Much Is That Twix

How Much Is That Twix




What does it cost us to be a society that chooses unwisely for health options? How much does it really cost us to have a candy bar, convey, a Twix? Its gone up to $1 for a candy bar now ( impossible to chocolate junkies ). Do we really know the costs? We do, in detail California funded a state - wide study regarding health care costs related to obesity and the plump position of many of its residents. They published it once in 2000 and decommissioned the alike firm to repeat the study in 2010. The findings are magnificent, but after all its California not here ( unless you are enumeration this in California ). That shouldnt diminish the sense of the study. The California study showed that the total annual estimated cost to California for chubby, obesity and material lethargy was $41. 2 billion $21. 0 billion for obese and obesity, and $20. 2 billion for it sleepiness. Health care costs totalled $20. 7 billion and minus productivity costs reached $20. 4 billion. Health care costs associated with plump and obesity were $12. 8 billion while health care costs associated with present lethargy totalled $7. 9 billion. Yet, mislaid productivity costs associated with rotund and obesity were $8. 2 billion, and vanished productivity costs associated with true sleepiness were $12. 3 billion. Those numbers are shocking and Im incontrovertible that a few readers are thinking well California has more people than my state or those solitary coasters are very different from people in my state. And I would respond by saying not true. The numbers might be different but the ratios are the equivalent. ubiquitous, and so the conclusions are consubstantial. I would recite that in conclusion the numbers show us that whatever our states actual costs for what we have to pay for being out of shape is, in a word, universally unacceptable.

The study also makes several recommendations which are great ideas and should be enacted by communities across the country regardless of the state. To reduce the economic burden associated with an fat, obese and physically inactive population, policies must be hackneyed at all levels to promote healthy eating and unaffected activity.

Nationally public health and prevention must be core elements of national health care reform.
State - wide health and human service agencies that influence environments where people live, work, learn and play must promote health through their policy and funding decisions.
At the field and tract level, local policies must be conscious to cinch that communities are places where residents can succulent make healthy eating and activity choices.
I would add in a few fresh suggestions:

Create convenient and safe opportunities for factual activity for all residents including bike paths, moving / running trails with lighting and safe from traffic. People must endure that they have access to better choices and those choices must be incomparable to employ.
Speaking of weakness, how about a tax yearning for companies to administer health club membership or corporate fitness programs for employees? How about a tax weakness for using trails, parks and recreational facility membership?
Enhance parks with play equipment including pools, playgrounds and fitness stations.
Provide funding for fitness leaders to develop programs at specific parks to haul emblematic residents to participate in activities as well as assisting in park up keep and maintenance. Inherent residents, who use the facilities, have no scrape assisting with maintaining the facility owing to they see a value in it for themselves and their families.
Planning commissions should consider future development to elicit residential, commercial and office buildings stuffy together so more residents can peregrination and bike to meet their daily needs
Provide safe and convenient opportunities to purchase fresh fruits and vegetables by ensuring that sources of healthy foods are accessible in all neighbourhoods.
Providing subsidized areas where local farms can sell their produce, coextensive Madison Wisconsin is doing with its Farmers Market. But we should go one better, we should base a year - round durable structure for this program and there should be a market in every community for ease of access
To last to prepare healthy sources of produce, communities should preserve regional agriculture and farmland
Communities should protect existing community gardens and support the creation of new ones as a source of fresh produce in underneath - served neighbourhoods.
But more; we should create a program that allows schools to develop farm plots for their own consumption. Kids would learn things from earth science to retail business practices and everything in between. Not to mention that the investment in space attached to the school also makes the space worthy to local residents and care for the space and surrounding area amount would increase and healthy food would be provided to students.

No comments:

Post a Comment